Friday, November 6, 2026

Kebenaran selalu sederhana dan jujur

"Kebenaran selalu sederhana dan jujur. Kebohongan selalu rumit dan berkelok-kelok."

by Leo Tolstoy, Sastrawan Rusia

HAPPY UAS ASSIGNMENT OF ACADEMIC WRITING 2026

Assalamu’alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh.

Dear students,

Please carefully read the following instructions and guidelines for your Final Examination (UAS) assignment in the Academic Writing course.

1. Assignment Description

You are required to develop a research proposal employing a qualitative research approach. Your proposal should clearly identify the anticipated research participants or respondents and/or the written or spoken data that will serve as the primary sources of your research.

2. Required Components of the Research Proposal

Your research proposal must include the following seven components:

a. Research Title
Provide a clear, specific, and academically appropriate title that reflects the focus of your proposed research.

b. Research Problems and Rationale
Identify the research gap, explain the significance of the research, and highlight its potential theoretical contributions. You should demonstrate an academic concern or research problem (keresahan akademik) that justifies why the study is worth conducting.

c. Research Locus and Primary Data Sources
Specify the anticipated research setting, participants/respondents, and/or sources of primary data. These may include written texts, spoken discourse, interviews, conversations, or other relevant qualitative data.

d. Research Questions / Problem Statements
Formulate at least two research questions or problem statements that will guide your investigation.

e. Theoretical Framework
Identify and explain the relevant theories or theoretical frameworks that will underpin your research analysis.

f. Research Methodology
Describe the research methods you intend to employ. Your study must adopt a qualitative research approach using a case study design.

g. References / Bibliography
Provide a list of relevant academic references that support your research topic, theoretical framework, and methodological approach.

For further guidance, please refer to the following document: Focus the Locus of Your Research UAS Assignment Dec 2022.pdf (available on Google Drive).

3. Submission Link

Submit your completed research proposal through the following Google Forms link:

https://forms.gle/rqi9PrNFy9yw26UP8

4. Submission Deadline: Saturday, December 19, at 11:59 PM (midnight).

Please ensure that your assignment is submitted before the deadline. Late submissions may not be accepted.

5. Video Explanation and Further Guidance

For a more comprehensive explanation of the Academic Writing final examination assignment, please watch the following instructional video:

https://youtu.be/IJmGUUbyKRo

Please pay close attention to all the requirements and ensure that your research proposal demonstrates a clear research focus, a well-defined academic problem, an appropriate theoretical foundation, and a coherent qualitative research methodology.

I wish you all the best in completing your final examination assignment.

Wassalamu’alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh.

Thursday, November 5, 2026

French offers various ways of saying hello

French offers various ways of saying hello depending on the level of formality, time of day, social relationships, and communicative situations. The most common expressions include Bonjour (Hello/Good morning), a polite and universal greeting; Bonsoir (Good evening), used in the evening; and Salut (Hi/Hey), an informal greeting among friends, classmates, and family members. Other expressions, such as Bonjour à tous (Hello, everyone) and Bonjour, Monsieur/Madame (Hello, Sir/Madam), are appropriate for addressing groups or showing respect in professional and formal interactions.

French also has several friendly and context-specific greetings. Coucou expresses warmth, affection, and familiarity, while Ça va? and Comment ça va? mean "How are you?" and help establish interpersonal connections. Quoi de neuf? (What's new?) invites people to share recent experiences, whereas Enchanté(e) (Nice to meet you) is commonly used when meeting someone for the first time. Other expressions include Allô for telephone conversations, Rebonjour for greeting someone again, and Bienvenue for welcoming guests. Regional variations also exist; for example, Bon matin (Good morning) is particularly associated with Quebec French, while French greetings in Senegal may coexist with local expressions such as the Wolof Nanga def?.

From a sociolinguistic and pragmatic perspective, French greetings communicate more than simply acknowledging someone's presence; they reflect politeness, social distance, solidarity, familiarity, respect, and cultural conventions. The choice between Bonjour and Salut, for instance, indicates differences in formality and interpersonal relationships, while Coucou conveys emotional closeness and Bonjour, Monsieur/Madame demonstrates respect. In France, saying Bonjour when entering shops, restaurants, or offices is an important politeness convention, as beginning a conversation directly with a request may sound impolite. Therefore, understanding these expressions helps language learners develop pragmatic competence, appropriate register selection, and intercultural communication skills.

Tuesday, November 3, 2026

MATERI KULIAH PAK FAIZAL

1. New eBooks

2. For Your Information: AI dan Analisis Data

Blackbox AI – AI assistant untuk membantu pekerjaan berbasis data dan pemrograman.
Web Tools, Aplikasi, Software + AI untuk Analisis Data Kuantitatif – tautan artikel pendukung.
AI Research Assistants dan Pencarian Research Gap and Novelty

3. Materi Perkuliahan dan E-Books

4. Only for Skripsi Fighters

collocation vs adjacency pair

Collocation is a habitual combination of words within language, while an adjacency pair is a two-turn conversational structure in which one speaker’s turn makes a particular kind of response expected. They belong to different levels of analysis: collocation is lexical, adjacency pairs are interactional.[ladal.edu][studocu]

Core difference

Feature	Collocation	Adjacency pair
What it is	Words that commonly occur together	Two related turns by different speakers
Level	Lexis / phraseology	Conversation / discourse
Focus	Word combinations	Social interaction and turn-taking
Example	make a decision, heavy rain	Question → answer; greeting → greeting
Relation	One word predicts another word	First turn creates an expectation for the second turn

Collocations are recurrent word partnerships, such as strong tea rather than normally powerful tea, or make a decision rather than do a decision. They may be adjacent, but they can also occur with words in between.[ladal.edu][files.eric.ed]

Collocation

A collocation is a combination of two or more words that co-occur more frequently than chance would predict. It is about which words naturally go together.[ladal.edu][ucrel.lancs.ac]

Examples:

heavy rain — not usually strong rain
make a decision — not usually do a decision
fast food
take medicine
commit a crime

In text analysis, you might identify provide information as a collocation; it can even appear non-adjacent, as in “provide some of the information.”[files.eric.ed][site.uottawa]

Adjacency pair

An adjacency pair is a sequence of two conversational turns: a first pair part and a second pair part. The first turn creates an expectation that the next turn will perform a related action.[studocu]

Examples:

Question → Answer: “Where do you live?” → “In Salatiga.”
Greeting → Greeting: “Good morning.” → “Good morning.”
Invitation → Acceptance/declination: “Would you like coffee?” → “Yes, please.”
Complaint → Apology: “You arrived late.” → “I’m sorry.”
Compliment → Response: “I like your presentation.” → “Thank you.”

The two turns are linked by their conversational function, not by word frequency.[studocu]

Quick illustration

A: “Could you close the window?”
B: “Sure.”

Here, request → acceptance is an adjacency pair. Within A’s utterance, close the window is a natural word combination, but the key interactional pattern is the request followed by an appropriate response.[studocu]

In short: collocations link words; adjacency pairs link speakers’ turns.[ladal.edu][studocu]

COHESION VS. COHERENCE

COHESION VS. COHERENCE

Cohesion is the visible “glue” that links words and sentences; coherence is the reader’s sense that the ideas form a meaningful, logical whole. A text can be cohesive but incoherent, or coherent despite limited cohesion.[web.unica][files.eric.ed]

Main difference

Aspect	Cohesion	Coherence
Level	Micro-level: sentences and clauses	Macro-level: whole text or paragraph
Nature	Linguistic/grammatical links	Logical and conceptual unity
Where it appears	On the surface of the text	In the reader’s interpretation
Examples	Pronouns, repetition, connectives, substitutions	Topic development, relevance, sequence of ideas
Main question	How are these parts formally connected?	Do the ideas make sense together?

Cohesion uses explicit cues such as pronouns, repeated words, and connectors like because, therefore, and however. Coherence depends on those cues but also on background knowledge, context, and the reader’s ability to infer relationships between ideas.[files.eric.ed][acikders.ankara.edu]

Cohesion in text analysis

Cohesive devices include:

Reference: “Ani bought a book. She read it all night.” — She refers to Ani.
Lexical repetition: “The storm damaged the roof. The storm also knocked down trees.”
Connectives: “He was tired; therefore, he went to bed.”
Substitution/ellipsis: “Would you like tea?” “Yes, I’d like one.” / “I will go if you will.”

These devices help readers track participants, topics, and relationships across sentences.[files.eric.ed][eapfoundation]

Coherence in text analysis

Coherence concerns whether the text has a clear central idea and whether its sentences are relevant and logically ordered. It is not always marked by explicit connectors; readers infer it from content and context.[web.unica][ub]

Example of a coherent paragraph:

Remote work has changed how teams communicate. Employees now rely more on written updates, video meetings, and shared documents. As a result, clear writing has become an important workplace skill.

The ideas move logically from a general change to its effects and then to a conclusion. There is some cohesion—as a result—but the coherence comes mainly from the unified topic and logical progression.[eapfoundation][awec.ntu.edu]

Examples showing the contrast

Cohesive but not coherent

My brother likes football. Footballs are usually round. Round objects include oranges. Oranges contain vitamin C.

The text uses repetition and related nouns, so it is fairly cohesive. But it does not develop one clear point, so readers may find it incoherent.[web.unica][journal.unnes.ac]

Coherent but not highly cohesive

Husband take gun shoot. Go outside die. Call police. Emergency 911.

This lacks polished grammatical linking, but a reader can reconstruct a sequence of events and understand the overall situation. It is therefore relatively coherent despite weak cohesion.[journals.sagepub]

In analysis

When analyzing a text, ask:

For cohesion: Which pronouns, repetitions, substitutions, and connectors link clauses or sentences?
For coherence: What is the main idea? Are all sentences relevant? Does the order of ideas help the reader understand the message?

In short, cohesion is about surface connectivity, while coherence is about underlying meaningfulness.[acikders.ankara.edu][uni-saarland]

Discourse analysis vs semantics vs pragmatics

Semantics studies literal meaning; pragmatics studies meaning in context and speaker intention; discourse analysis studies how language is organized and functions across sentences, turns, or whole texts. They overlap, but differ mainly in unit of analysis and focus.[seas3.elte][assets.cambridge]

Core distinction

Field	Main question	Typical unit	Examples of focus
Semantics	What does an expression mean in itself?	Words, phrases, sentences	Word meaning, synonymy, ambiguity, truth conditions
Pragmatics	What does the speaker mean by using it here?	Utterances in context	Implicature, speech acts, politeness, deixis, reference
Discourse analysis	How is communication structured and what is it doing?	Conversations, texts, interactions	Turn-taking, cohesion, narrative structure, power/ideology, genre

Semantics treats meaning largely as a property of linguistic expressions, abstracted from particular speakers and situations; pragmatics adds the speaker, hearer, purpose, and situation.[seas3.elte][assets.cambridge]

Semantics vs pragmatics

Semantics: “Can you pass the salt?” literally asks whether the hearer has the physical ability to pass salt.
Pragmatics: In a dinner-table context, it is normally understood as a polite request to pass the salt.

Pragmatics explains that gap between literal meaning and intended meaning through context, shared assumptions, and speaker goals.[seas3.elte][assets.cambridge]

Where discourse analysis fits

Discourse analysis looks beyond a single utterance: it examines how utterances connect into a coherent conversation or text, and how participants manage interaction. It studies language “above the sentence,” including conversational exchanges and written texts.[seas3.elte][blackwellpublishing]

For example, in a meeting, discourse analysis might examine:

Who interrupts whom and how turns are allocated.
How a speaker uses “however,” “so,” and pronouns to connect ideas.
How repeated framing constructs authority, blame, or consensus.

Pragmatics may explain a particular indirect request or implication; discourse analysis explains how those moves contribute to the larger interaction.[blackwellpublishing][pdfs.semanticscholar]

How they relate

A useful shorthand:

Semantics: meaning encoded by language.
Pragmatics: meaning created through language use in context.
Discourse analysis: how language use is organized and functions in real communication.[seas3.elte][pdfs.semanticscholar][lancaster.ac]

They are not rigidly separate boxes. Pragmatics often supplies concepts that discourse analysts use—such as speech acts, implicature, and deixis—while discourse analysis provides a broader framework for studying actual conversations and texts.[blackwellpublishing][pdfs.semanticscholar]

song lyrics populer untuk translation exercise

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qrVCBr_bXyxzmJOOgJ_EUbuv-dH3K30j/view?usp=sharing

Totto

Baby Totto

Pragmatisme, Kerangka penghubung metode kuantitatif & kualitatif

Dalam penelitian pendidikan—khususnya English Language Teaching (ELT)—teori yang paling sering dipakai sebagai kerangka penghubung metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif adalah pragmatisme sebagai paradigma metodologis, lalu dilengkapi teori substantif ELT seperti sociocultural theory, self-determination theory, social cognitive/self-efficacy theory, dan L2 Motivational Self System. Pragmatisme menjadi “jembatan” karena memilih metode berdasarkan pertanyaan penelitian dan apa yang paling berguna untuk menjawabnya, bukan karena keterikatan pada satu paradigma.[academic.oup][laulima.hawaii][research.usq.edu]

Kerangka metodologis utama

Blog Dr. Faizal Risdianto: 𝟳𝟮 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹 AI 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿...

Blog Dr. Faizal Risdianto: 𝟳𝟮 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹 AI 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿...: 𝟳𝟮 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 (𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻) Most researchers don't struggle becaus...

𝟳𝟮 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 (𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻)

Most researchers don't struggle because of a lack of tools.

They struggle because they don't know which tool fits which stage.

So I organised 72 tools across the full research journey, from finding your first paper to getting published.

𝟬𝟭 𝗟𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 → Elicit, Consensus, Semantic Scholar

𝟬𝟮 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗴 → Litmaps, ResearchRabbit, Connected Papers JabRef

𝟬𝟯 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀 → Zotero, Elsevier | Mendeley, EndNote

𝟬𝟰 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 & 𝗦𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 → SciSpace, NotebookLM, Scholary

𝟬𝟱 𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 & 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 → Paperpal, Trinka, Overleaf

𝟬𝟲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀 → SPSS, R, JASP

𝟬𝟳 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 & 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗩𝗶𝘇 → NVivo, ATLAS.ti, Tableau

𝟬𝟴 𝗙𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 & 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 → BioRender, Canva, Gamma

𝟬𝟵 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 & 𝗣𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 → iThenticate, ORCID, Crossref, DOAJ

Stage 09 is where many good papers get stuck. A strong manuscript still needs an integrity check, a verified ORCID, and the right journal, ideally one listed in DOAJ or a trusted index.

𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿:
AI tools speed you up, but they don't replace judgement. Verify every citation against the original source and follow your target journal's AI-use policy.

Which tool would you add to this list? Tell me in the comments.

Save this for your next project and share it with a researcher who needs it.

Planning to start your own academic journal or get it indexed? Let's talk: digitalbisht.com

#AcademicResearch #ResearchTools #PhDLife #AcademicWriting #LiteratureReview #OpenAccess #ScholarlyPublishing #AIinResearch

Pages