Daftar url Link Streaming TV Online di Indonesia.
1. Link Streaming TransTv klik di sini.
Daftar url Link Streaming TV Online di Indonesia.
List of IFFY /doubtful SENTENCES
1 I’m sorry I’m not here.
2 Ring/call Mary, her husband used to be Malaysian.
3 She made me a father.
4 Shut up so I can hear you!
5 All my friends are priests but I don’t have any friends.
6 He made me a mother.
7 She’s got twin sisters who are a year older than she is.
8 Too much is not quite enough.
9 Could I have a little less water in my coffee please?
10 He didn’t want to have his bath again.
11 The woman who has two studies always does her best work in the other one.
12 I am angry with him for having what I gave him.
13 Oh God, may I be alive when I die!
14 Well, the man’s broken all his legs
15 My toothbrush is pregnant again
16 When we want your opinion, we’ll give it to you
17 These ideas have been asleep for several years now.
18 It’s going to be tomorrow soon.
19 I don’t want him to get into the water until he has learnt to swim.
20 Write down three things you don’t know about the other person.
21 I’ve lost my umbrella here and it isn’t even mine.
22 He knows everything and he’s not interested in anything else.
23 Britain’s roads are becoming less dangerous but more deadly
24 I forbid you to go out again if you don’t come back.
25 Death, be not proud because you shall die soon
”Build your dream and your dream will build You”
The English learning site http://www.pakfaizal.com/
#UBUNTU#
An anthropologist shows a game to tribal children in Africa. He put a basket full of fruit near the tree. Furthermore, he instructed the children that the child who runs first reaches the tree has the right to get a fruit basket. Nevertheless, as soon as the Anthropologist gave the signal: 'Begin...!' He was surprised because the children walked hand in hand without scrambling to get ahead of each other.
When anthropologists ask: 'Why did you do that? Even though you have the opportunity to get a basket of fruit alone. Moreover, they replied: 'Ubuntu!... how can one of us be happy while the other friend is sad.'
Ubuntu in their civilization means: 'I am we.' The tribe understands the secret of happiness, which is precisely lost or 'eliminated' in modern society, which is very individualistic and egocentric. Nevertheless, they consider themselves as the most civilized society.
Pre-Experimental Research
Pre-experimental research or pre-experimental designs are research designs that have not been categorized as real experiments. This is because, in this design, no random sampling has been carried out, and sufficient control has not been carried out on confounding variables that can affect the dependent variable.
There are several types of pre-experimental research, including:
a. One-Shot Case Study
b. One Group Pretest-Posttest
c. Intact-Group Comparison.
The three pre-experimental designs used different methods, but each design was given treatment. The difference lies in the use of the pretest in the design (Yusuf, 2014).
Referensi buku untuk mahasiswa yang akan/sedang menulis TA dan Skripsi.
Buku Penelitian Tindakan Kelas
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/11g0Vg2LjedfPfa7lC-52IWUWIPoLzRFX
Buku Statistik
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13lry7XmHc2Tmd7pg1MV29gv1jYaKI6od
Buku Metode Penelitian
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1UfuFUgM9msZpmzHaFrCRTZEZF7oeqAVc
Keluhan Umum yang khas pada Editor, Reviewer jurnal dan juga dosen pembimbing Skripsi/thesis/Disertasi:
Bagian Discussion atau Pembahasan gagal mengaitkan temuan dan pengamatan dengan studi lain yang relevan, dan tampaknya tidak ada diskusi tentang implikasi dan keterbatasan temuan ini.
Hasil utama/Results atau Findings dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa P=Q. Namun, tidak ada penjelasan lengkap yang diberikan. Penulis hanya membatasi Pembahasan tentang P dengan melaporkan temuan sebelumnya yang sudah didokumentasikan dalam beberapa makalah. Saya menemukan Diskusi semacam ini terlalu spekulatif dan terbatas. Penulis mengklaim peningkatan efisiensi dan pengelolaan yang mudah. Namun, dia tidak memasukkan hasil percobaan yang menunjukkan seberapa cepat sistem baru akan bekerja (dalam hal kinerja) dibandingkan dengan metode tradisional. Jika penulis tidak memilih untuk menyertakan implementasi yang sebenarnya, cacat ini dapat ditunjukkan di bagian batasan/pekerjaan mendatang sebagai subbagian di bagian Pembahasan.
Bagaimana saya harus menyusun Diskusi?
Diskusi harus menjawab pertanyaan-pertanyaan berikut, mungkin dalam urutan berikut. Dengan demikian, Anda dapat menggunakan jawaban untuk menyusun Diskusi Anda. Ini memberi Anda template yang relatif mudah diikuti.
1. Apakah data saya mendukung apa yang ingin saya tunjukkan di awal makalah?
2. Bagaimana temuan saya dibandingkan dengan temuan orang lain? Seberapa konsisten mereka?
3. Apa interpretasi pribadi saya atas temuan saya?
4. Apa kemungkinan interpretasi lain yang ada?
5. Apa keterbatasan studi saya? Faktor lain apa yang dapat memengaruhi temuan saya? Sudahkah saya melaporkan semua yang dapat membuat temuan saya tidak valid?
6. Apakah interpretasi mengungkapkan kemungkinan cacat (yaitu, cacat, kesalahan) dalam percobaan saya?
7. Apakah interpretasi saya menyumbangkan pemahaman baru tentang masalah yang telah saya selidiki? Dalam hal apa mereka menyarankan kekurangan, atau kemajuan, karya orang lain?
8. Validitas eksternal apa yang dimiliki temuan saya? Bagaimana temuan saya dapat digeneralisasikan ke area lain?
9. Apa kemungkinan implikasi atau penerapan temuan saya? Dukungan apa yang dapat saya berikan untuk implikasi seperti itu?
10. Penelitian lebih lanjut apa yang diperlukan untuk menjelaskan masalah yang diangkat oleh temuan saya? Apakah saya akan melakukan penelitian ini, atau apakah saya ingin membukanya untuk masyarakat?
Apa pun disiplin Anda, Anda harus menjawab semua pertanyaan di atas, kecuali pertanyaan 8 (temuan Anda mungkin hanya sangat awal).
Apakah Anda menjawab pertanyaan 8–10 bergantung pada apakah Anda memiliki bagian Kesimpulan yang terpisah; jika demikian, Kesimpulan mungkin lebih tepat. Mungkin masuk akal bagi Anda untuk mengatur Diskusi Anda mengikuti urutan yang sama seperti saat Anda mempresentasikan temuan Anda di bagian Hasil. Dalam hal ini, Anda mendiskusikan setiap survei, studi, atau eksperimen dan menafsirkannya dalam keseluruhan skenario masalah.
Typical complaints of Referees
The Discussion fails to relate the findings and observations to other relevant studies, and there appears to be no discussion on the implications and limitations of these findings.
The main result of this study was that P=Q. However, no exhaustive explanations are given. The authors simply limit the Discussion on P by reporting previous findings already documented in several papers. I find this kind of Discussion too speculative and limited. The author claims improved efficiency and easy management. However, he did not include any experimental results showing how fast the new system would work (in terms of performance) compared to the traditional method. If the author does not choose to include the actual implementation, this defect can be pointed out in the limitation/future work section as a subsection in the Discussion section.
17.1 How should I structure the Discussion?
The Discussion should answer the following questions, possibly in the following order. You can thus use the answers to structure your Discussion. This gives you a relatively easy template to follow.
1. Do my data support what I set out to demonstrate at the beginning of the paper?
2. How do my findings compare with what others have found? How consistent are they?
3. What is my personal interpretation of my findings?
4. What other possible interpretations are there?
5. What are the limitations of my study? What other factors could have influenced my findings? Have I reported everything that could make my findings invalid?
6. Do any interpretations reveal a possible flaw (i.e., defect, error) in my experiment?
7. Do my interpretations contribute some new understanding of the problem I have investigated? In which case do they suggest a shortcoming in, or an advance on, the work of others?
8. What external validity do my findings have? How could my findings be generalized to other areas?
9. What possible implications or applications do my findings have? What support can I give for such implications?
10. What further research would be needed to explain the issues raised by my findings? Will I do this research, or do I want to open it to the community?
Whatever your discipline, you will need to answer all the questions above, except question 8 (your findings may only be very preliminary).
Whether you answer questions 8–10 depends on whether you have a separate Conclusions section; if so, the Conclusions may be more appropriate. It may make sense for you to organize your Discussion following the same sequence as your present your findings in the Results section. In this case, you discuss each survey, study or experiment and interpret it within the overall scenario of the problem.
http://mpi.uinsgd.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/english-for-research-paper-ebook.pdf
English for Writing Research Papers (tiramisutes.github.io)
English for Writing Research Papers by Adrian Wallwork (auth.) - PDF Drive