1. https://bit.ly/registerjournal
LIST 8 Jurnal Terindeks Scopus untuk focus & scope Indonesian language Education & Literature
1. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE) https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde Q2 Free APC
2. CLCWeb - Comparative Literature and Culture: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/ Q3 Free APC
3. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/index
Q3 Article Publication: 295.00 (USD)
4. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp Q3 Article Processing Charges: 2500000.00 (IDR)The new APC with effect from February 2023 will be 4000000,00 (IDR) (Four Million Indonesian Rupiah)
5. International Journal of Language Education https://ojs.unm.ac.id/ijole Q1 the publication fee $235.
6. PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjssh Q3 250 USD
7. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/index Q2 (APCs) of USD 350
8. Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia http://wacana.ui.ac.id/index.php/wjhi/index Q2 FREE APC
sumber: https://www.pegiatjurnal.com/2022/07/list-8-jurnal-terindeks-scopus-untuk.html
Language as a means of human communication is very interesting to learn. The science of studying language is called linguistics. In linguistics itself, there are many other branches of science. One of them is pragmatics. In general, pragmatics is the study of meaning based on context. (George Yule, 1996:3) It doesn't stop there, in pragmatics it also turns out to study many things. One of them is language politeness. Well, politeness is the main focus of this post. There are several experts who express their opinions about the concept of politeness. Brown and Levinson are the experts who introduced the concept of politeness strategy.
Politeness Strategy
The concept of
politeness strategy was adapted by Brown and Levinson from the face concept
introduced by Erving Goffman, a sociologist. According to Goffman, the face is a
picture of self-image in agreed social attributes. This face can be interpreted
as honor, self-esteem, and self-image in public (public self-image).
So, face here is not
defined as a yes face, but self-respect. We as social beings when interacting
with others have the potential to injure or harm the self-esteem of others.
These are called face-threatening acts (FTA). This act of attacking self-esteem
or FTA has a relationship with language politeness.
Why? Because when we
attack someone's self-esteem, we will instinctively realize that our actions
will harm others. So that we will also prepare politeness strategies when
talking to other people by looking for ways so that our actions do not offend
the interlocutor. The strategy we seek has levels. Brown and Levinson
categorize them into 5 levels. Among others are:
1. Bald-on record
strategy (without strategy), this strategy is carried out by speakers by
not making any effort to reduce the consequences of threatening. Alias speaks openly. This strategy is usually done with people who are
already familiar. An example of his utterance is “hey, wake up!”
2. Negative
politeness strategy, this strategy contains a low level of politeness. For
example, when we wake up a roommate in a boarding house with the words,
"Ven, wake up dong". The word Ven is a form of negative politeness.
3. Positives
politeness strategy, this strategy is used to show intimacy and is usually
used to the interlocutor who is not known or to the interlocutor who is
familiar but has a great need. For example, we will speak more politely to a
college friend we don't know than to a friend we already know.
4. off-record
politeness strategy (indirect or disguised strategy), this strategy is
realized in a sarcastic or disguised way. For example, we forget not to bring a
pen when we are going to take the civil servant written exam, then we want to
borrow it from the gentlemen next to us. We don't immediately say "You can
borrow a pen", but say "Sorry, sir, do you have more pens?".
5. Don't do FTA
(do nothing), this strategy is the highest politeness strategy. In this
strategy, we do not do anything that can interfere with self-esteem.
For example, we are
being invited by a lecturer on vacation, and suddenly on the way we want to pee.
But we are silent, not daring to speak because we are very reluctant to ask to
stop at a public toilet. So, the concept of politeness strategy offered by
Brown and Levinson can be used to prevent or repair the damage caused by actions
that attack self-esteem. Okay, now let's move on to the principle of
politeness!
Politeness Principle
According to Leech (in Joan Cutting, 2002), there are six maxims
in the politeness principle. The six principles are:
a.
The maxim of wisdom (tact), namely the principle that refers to
reducing one's own benefits and maximizing the benefits of others. According to
Leech, this type of maxim is the most important kind of politeness in society.
(Joan Cutting, 2002: 419) Example: A: “Let's finish the fruit salad! There's
still a lot inside, really."
B: "Wow, the fruit salad is really fresh, Mom."
The above statement shows that what A says maximizes profit for
B.
b.
Generosity maxim, namely the principle that refers to minimizing
benefits for oneself and maximizing self-sacrifice. (Joan Cutting, 2002: 49)
Example: Mother A: "Oops, I've run out of fried oil."
Mother B: “Just use my cooking oil, ma'am. I'll take it to the
kitchen first."
The statement above shows that what Mrs. B said minimizes
benefits for oneself and maximizes self-sacrifice, namely by offering and
getting cooking oil.
c.
The maxim of acceptance, which is the principle that refers to
minimizing belittling others and maximizing praise for others. (Joan Cutting,
2002:49)
For example, the speech "wow, your bread is delicious, ya"
will be appreciated rather than the speech, "your bread is not
good!".
d.
Modesty, namely the principle that refers to reducing
self-praise and adding insults to oneself. (Joan Cutting, 2002:49)
Example: X: "You'll sing at the wedding, okay?" Y:
“okay, but my voice is not good.”
From the maxim above, we can see that Y reduced self-praise and
added insults to himself by calling his voice bad.
e.
The maxim of agreement, which is the principle that refers to
reducing disagreement with others and increasing agreement with others. (Joan
Cutting, 2002:50)
Example: X: “Wow, it feels like the day is going by really
fast.” Y: “Yes, indeed!” From the maxims above, we can see that Y's statement
is to apply the principle of agreement, namely by agreeing to what X said.
f.
Maxim of sympathy, namely the principle that refers to
minimizing antipathy and maximizing sympathy for others. (Joan Cutting,
2002:50)
Example: A: “Next month my book will be published.” B: “Wow,
congratulations! You are great!"
From the speech above, we can see that what B said applies the
principle of sympathy, namely by congratulating A's success. So, that's it,
guys, explanations of strategy and politeness principles. This knowledge is
very important for anyone to know considering we are social creatures who
interact with other people every day.
A translation of this
blog post:
Mari
Mengenal Strategi Kesantunan dan Prinsip Kesantunan dalam Pragmatik |
kumparan.com
Bibliography
Cutting, Joan.
Pragmatics and Discourse. London: Routledge. 2002.
Syahrin, Elvi.
"Politeness Strategy as Pragmatic Competence in French Directive Speech
Acts". Medan State University. 2008.
Yule, George.
pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1996.
Well, actually, "you are welcome" can be expressed in another way, you know. English will definitely be more interesting if you use the 15 phrases to replace "you are welcome" presented in this article. Here they go!
1. My Pleasure
X : I like the gift so much. Thank you! (I really liked the gift. Thank you!)
Y: It's my pleasure.
2. Anytime
X : Wow, it's my favorite toy! Thanks for giving me this!
Y : Anytime.
3. No Worries
X : It's very kind of you to help me studying new language. Thanks a lot! (You were very kind to help me learn a new language. Thank you so much!)
Y : No worries.
4. Not At All
X : My tasks won't be finished without you. Thanks for helping me! (My work would not be complete without you. Thank you for helping me!)
Y : Not at all. (You're welcome.)
5. Don't Mention It
X : I can't thank you enough for everything you've done for me. (I'm so grateful for everything you've done for me.)
Y : Don't mention it.
6. No Problem
X : You helped me fix my laptop. Thanks, Jo!
Y : No problem.
7. Sure
X : Thanks for being my best friend throughout high school!
Y: Sure!
8. Glad To Help
X : You are so helpful. Thank you!
Y : Glad to help.
9. No Big Deal
X : You saved my cat from an accident. Thank you very much!
Y : No big deal.
10. It Was Nothing
X : Thanks for your help in completing my works!
Y : It was nothing.
11. Don't Worry About It
X : You always help me at school. Thank you!
Y : Don't worry about it.
12. Happy To Be Of Service
X : I can't imagine cooking without your help. Thanks, Jessica!
Y : Happy to be of service.
13. You Would've Done The Same For Me
X : Thanks for lending your book to me!
Y : You would've done the same for me.
14. It Was The Least I Could Do
X : You helped me through my hard times. I can't thank you enough!
Y : It was the least I could do.
15. That's Absolutely Fine
X : Thanks for the support you have given to me.
Y : That's absolutely fine.
As your mastery of other expressions of "you are welcome" gets richer, don't forget to practice, OK! Instead of using "you are welcome" from now on, you can replace it with the 15 expressions above.
source: https://www.ef.co.id/englishfirst/kids/blog/15-ungkapan-untuk-menggantikan-you-are-welcome/
menurut yang saya tahu dan hasil googling
sudah ada
1. APSPBI Asosiasi Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris https:www.apspbi.or.id
2. ada ENGLISH STUDIES ASSOCIATION IN INDONESIA (ESAI) https://www.esai-indonesia.org/.
3. ada juga The Association for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia https://www.teflin.org/
4. kalo asosiasi dosen di bawah kementrian agama/IAIN/UIN namanya ELITE Indonesia https://www.eliteptki.com/.
jadi sebenarnya sudah banyak asosiasi dosen dan jurusan bahasa inggris. tinggal pilih saja. 😇
5. https://itell.or.id/membership-type/ iTELL juga bisa jadi pilihan. 🙂
6. https://eltaorganization.org/ Ini jg Ada bpk/ibu
7. ada yang khusus kajian linguistik fungsional: pragmatics, CDA, semiotics, SFL, ELT:Ina-PrA - Asosiasi Pragmatik Indonesia / Indonesian Pragmatics Association - https://www.inapra.org/
Assalamualaikum wr wb info ttg jurnal terindex scopus kajian ELT (yg bukan jurnal předator:
1.relc journal
2. The journal of asia tefl
3. Siele
4. Ijole
5. XLinguae
6. CALL-EJ
7. TEwT
Smg bermanfaat bagi semua
PAPER About LEXEME
Arranged by:
INDAH WIDYA ASTUTIK 23030170225
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT-FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHERS TRAINING-INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI SALATIGA-2022
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1
A. Background 1
B. Formulation of The Problem 1
C. Purpose 1
CHAPTER II DISCUSSION 2
A. Definition of lexeme 2
B. Lexemes in standard descriptive and theoretical lexeme-based morphology 2
C. Lexeme Formation Rules 3
D. Troubles with lexemes 3
E. Troubles with Lexeme Formation Rules 4
CHAPTER III CLOSING 5
A. Conclusion 5
B. Recommendation 5
REFERENCES 6
Chapter I INTRODUCTION
A. BACKGROUND
Language is very important in communication, both written and unwritten. So that its use must be based on a rich and complete language and vocabulary. Like wise, the Indonesian language belongs to us is an effective and efficient communication tool for unifying this nation.
Grammar mistakes placed by the prevalence of its use so that it can be accepted by all users, namely standard grammar. Standard grammar is a language that is fluent in its use and is not restrictive for the language in question. Language has a structure and form that composes a word. Therefore, language morphology is the study of the structure and form of words which are very important to be studied by this nation from the lower to the upper levels.
I.
Introduction
Nowadays,
many linguists use the term 'word' less carefully, so Lyons proposes as
follows,
"However, since most linguists now employ the term 'word' to refer to such phonological or orthographical units such as /sæŋ/ or 'sang' or /ˌɪdɪəˈsɪŋkrəsi / or "idiosyncrasy" on the one hand, or to the grammatical units they represent, on the other hand, (and indeed do not always distinguish even between these two senses), we shall introduce another term, lexeme, to denote the more 'abstract' units which occur in different inflexional 'forms' according to the syntactic rules involved in the generation of sentences" (1968:197). So, the word or 'word' is distinguished from the word or 'lexeme'.