Daftar 97 Jurnal Ilmiah di Indonesia yang terindeks Scopus:
I'm Learning to Learn, Re-Learn and Un-Learn
Tulisan Pak Faizal 2016-2023
Tulisan Tahun 2016
Risdianto, F. (2016). Discourse Analysis of a Song Lyric
Entitled "We Will Not Go Down”. Register Journal, 9(1), 90-105.
doi:https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v9i1.90-105
REGISTER JOURNAL June
2016
https://journalregister.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/article/view/524
Tulisan Tahun 2017
Risdianto, F. (2017). A Phonological Analysis on the English
Consonants of Sundanese EFL Speakers
Faizal Risdianto.ARBITRER 4(1) (2017). JURNAL ARBITRER JUNE 2017 http://arbitrer.fib.unand.ac.id/index.php/arbitrer/article/view/77
Tulisan Tahun 2018
The Representation of Power in the Text News on the Meiliana
Case (A Norman Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis) by Faizal Risdianto,
Sumarlam Sumarlam, Noor Malihah
Available Online November 2018. Proceedings of the
International Seminar on Recent Language, Literature, and Local Cultural
Studies (BASA 2018)
https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/basa-18/25906091
Tulisan Tahun 2019
Risdianto, F., Malihah, N., & Guritno, A. (2019). The
problem of Presupposition in George Orwell’s Novella Animal Farm. Journal of
Pragmatics Research, 1(1), 1-12.
doi:https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v1i1.1-12
JOPR June 2019
https://e-journal.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/jopr/article/view/2413
Gunawan, F., Thahara, Y., & Risdianto, F. (2019). Trick
of Political Identity: Analysing Appraisal System on 212 Movement Reunion in
Online Media. Register Journal, 12(1), 62-80.
doi:https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v12i1.62-80. REGISTER JUNE 2019
https://journalregister.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/article/view/2455
Video as Educational Multimedia to Teach English Speaking by
Novia Fajar Masyitoh1, Noor Malihah1, Faizal Risdianto1 and Agung Guritno1. Published
under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 1339,
International Conference Computer Science and Engineering (IC2SE) 26–27 April
2019, Padang, Indonesia.
Citation Novia Fajar Masyitoh et al 2019 J. Phys.: Conf.
Ser. 1339 012118
DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012118
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012118/meta
The use of drama to develop English speaking autonomous
learning by Faizal Risdianto, Sari
Famularsih, Setia Rini, Ahmad Mifdlol Muthohar. Year: 2019. The use of drama to
develop English speaking autonomous learning. SEWORD FRESSH- EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2286844. Proceedings of the 1st
Seminar and Workshop on Research Design, for Education, Social Science, Arts,
and Humanities, SEWORD FRESSH 2019, April 27 2019, Surakarta, Central Java,
Indonesia
https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2286844
Risdianto, F., Sumarlam, S., & Santosa, R. (2019).
Representation of Power in the News Text of the Inclusion of Indigenous Faiths
on ID Card (e-KTP). NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 10(2),
131–148. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2019.10.2.131-148
http://jurnalfahum.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/nobel/article/view/205
Tulisan Tahun 2020
Risdianto, Faizal. (2020). The Development of Islamic
English Register in Pawening Madrassa. International Journal of English
Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE). 2. 10.32585/.v2i1.618.
http://journal.univetbantara.ac.id/index.php/ijelle/article/view/618
DIGITAL NATIVES PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES IN LEARNING ENGLISH
by Arti Novia Tiara Kristy, Noor Malihah, Faizal Risdianto, Supardi Supardi, JURNAL
LEKSIKA UMP PURWOKERTO FEBRUARI 2022
https://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/LEKSIKA/issue/view/625
Tulisan Tahun 2022
Yudhanto, S., & Risdianto, F. (2022). The pragmatics and
Semiotics Analysis of Vinyl Record Cover Art They Fell From The Sky's Album
DECADE. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 4(2), 167-178.
doi:https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v4i2.167-178
https://e-journal.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/jopr/article/view/7784
PENGUATAN MODERASI BERAGAMA DAN TOLERANSI MELALUI ‘QUOTES’
DI KAMPUNG MRICAN, GENDONGAN, TINGKIR, SALATIGA
by Faizal Risdianto, Imam Mas Arum. BUBUNGAN TINGGI: JURNAL PENGABDIAN
MASYARAKAT
https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journals/index.php/btj/article/view/5152
Norwanto, N., & Risdianto, F. (2022). The Norm
Establishment in WhatsApp Group Conversations. Journal of Language and
Literature, 22(2), 504-517. doi:https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i2.4810
SEPTEMBER 2022 JOLL
https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/JOLL/article/view/4810
Risdianto, F., Sumarlam, S., Wiratno, T., & Djatmika, D.
(2022). Attitudinal Analysis of Kompas Online & Republika Concerning The
Relocation of Indonesia's Capital City News. International Journal of Science
and Applied Science: Conference Series, 6(1), 195-209.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v6i1.70142
https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijsascs/article/view/70142
Risdianto, F., Machfudz, M., Sagimin, E. M., Hanafi, H.,
& Jumanto, J. (2023). Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies in
Lecturer-Student Communication Within Cyberpragmatic Chats. Journal of
Pragmatics Research, 5(1), 107–134. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/jopr/article/view/95
Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies in Lecturer-Student Communication Within Cyberpragmatics Chats
Faizal Risdianto, Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga
Machfudz Machfudz, Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga
Eka Margianti Sagimin, Universitas Pamulang
Hanafi Hanafi, Universitas Andalas
Jumanto Jumanto, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Abstract
This qualitative research on Cyberpragmatics attempts to explore the application of politeness and impoliteness principles in student-lecturer internet-mediated communication in English and Indonesian languages at two faculties of Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Salatiga. The native speakers' perceptions of those strategies and principles as applied in the online chatroom were also elicited to confirm the descriptive analysis of the utterances. Pragmatic data were taken, categorized, and selected from Whatsapp conversation and email correspondence screenshots between lecturers and students in eight (8) online English Language classes and six (6) classes on Ushul Fiqh subjects at Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Salatiga. Additionally, as demonstrated in the screenshots, an online questionnaire was used to elicit data on students' and lecturers' perspectives on the cyberpragmatic activities. The descriptive analysis shows that the students considered the principles of politeness as a prominent aspect for their communicative actions and managed to appropriately applied it in their cyberpragmatic activities. Additional pragmatic features of religious expressions were also used to amplify the politeness effect. Nevertheless, there were some cases where impoliteness principles were used by the students, regardless of their awareness of their pragmatic consequences. The acceptability judgement questionnaire confirmed the level of politeness and impoliteness strategies previously described. Consequently, future research may benefit from this study by exploring other aspects of cyberpragmatics such as ethnicity, gender, and other socio-political aspects, from interdisciplinary perspectives.
Keywords: (im)politeness, student-lecturer communication, computer-mediated communication, Cyberpragmatics, chats
Source: https://ejournal.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/jopr/article/view/95
4 types of Trianggulation in Qualitative Research
.jpg)
Data triangulation refers to using a validation test process from qualitative data (Interviews, Observations, FGDs). Triangulation refers to using several methods or data sources in qualitative research to comprehensively understand a phenomenon (Patton, 1999). Triangulation is also a qualitative research strategy to test validity by converging information from various sources. Denzin (1978) and Patton (1999) identified four types of triangulation: (a) method triangulation, (b) inter-researcher triangulation, (c) theory triangulation, and (d) data source triangulation. This article will present the four types of triangulation, followed by a discussion of using focus groups (FGs) and in-depth individual interviews (IDI) as examples of triangulation of data sources in qualitative research.
How is Triangulation Practiced in Research?
Triangulation is commonly used in qualitative research and applied in quantitative research. If your research uses mixed methods, you will always use methodological triangulation.
Example: Triangulation in various types of research
• Qualitative research: You conduct in-depth interviews with various stakeholder groups, such as parents, teachers, and children.
• Quantitative research: You run an eye-tracking experiment and involve three researchers in analyzing the data.
• Mixed methods research: You conduct a quantitative survey, followed by some structured (qualitative) interviews.
Types of Triangulation in Research
There are four types of triangulation:
•Data triangulation: Using data from different times, spaces, and people
•Triangulation techniques between researchers: Involve many researchers in collecting or analyzing data
•Theory triangulation techniques: Use multiple theoretical perspectives in your research
Methodological triangulation: Using different methodologies to approach the same topic
Example: Collaborative research. You research what makes people behave cooperatively vs. selfishly. You want to understand what motivates people to work with others in a team environment.
Methodological triangulation
When using qualitative triangulation methods, you use different methods to answer the same research question. This triangulation is the most common type, and researchers often combine qualitative and quantitative research methods in a single study.
Data triangulation
In data triangulation, you use multiple data sources to answer your research question. You can vary data collection across different times, spaces, or people.
Triangulation between researchers
Using the researcher triangulation technique, you involve multiple observers or researchers to collect, process, or analyze data separately.
Theory triangulation
Theory triangulation means applying several different theoretical frameworks in your research instead of approaching the research question from only one theoretical perspective.
SOURCE: Triangulasi Data, Contoh, Penjelasan dan Prakteknya Pada Riset - Ascarya Solution
TUTORIAL GRAMMARLY FOR MS WORD
Dear Students and Netizens
for checking and correcting grammar and paraphrasing of theses and articles for online scientific journals
Please download the free add on from Grammarly to MS Word on your laptop: https://www.grammarly.com/office-addin
and here is a video tutorial on how to download, install and use this cool application: https://youtu.be/unMc-W-Mkvo
aspect of perception according to Woodworth and Marquis
Woodworth and Marquis were psychologists who proposed a theory of perception that emphasized the active role of the perceiver in shaping their perception of the world. According to their theory, perception is influenced by three main aspects: stimulus, attention, and context.
The stimulus refers to the physical energy that impinges on the senses, such as light waves for vision or sound waves for hearing. However, Woodworth and Marquis argued that the physical stimulus alone is not enough to determine perception. Instead, they suggested that attention and context also play important roles.
Attention refers to the process of selectively focusing on certain aspects of the environment while ignoring others. For example, if you are in a crowded room, you might focus your attention on one person's voice while tuning out other conversations. Woodworth and Marquis argued that attention can influence perception by directing the perceiver's focus to certain features of the environment.
Context refers to the broader situation in which perception occurs. For example, the same object may be perceived differently depending on the context in which it is presented. If you see a cup on a table, you might perceive it as a drinking cup, but if you see the same cup on a shelf in a store, you might perceive it as a decorative item. Woodworth and Marquis argued that context can influence perception by providing additional information about the meaning or function of a stimulus.
Overall, Woodworth and Marquis emphasized that perception is an active process in which the perceiver plays an important role in shaping their perception of the world. Their theory highlights the complex interplay between the physical stimulus, attention, and context in shaping perception.
kelemahan penelitian pre eksperimental
Penelitian pre-eksperimental adalah jenis penelitian di mana peneliti tidak memilih kelompok kontrol atau kelompok perbandingan untuk dibandingkan dengan kelompok eksperimen. Beberapa kelemahan penelitian pre-eksperimental adalah:
Kurangnya kelompok kontrol: Karena tidak adanya kelompok kontrol, penelitian pre-eksperimental memiliki kelemahan dalam mengukur pengaruh variabel bebas secara tepat. Oleh karena itu, hasil dari penelitian pre-eksperimental cenderung tidak dapat diandalkan secara statistik.
Tidak ada acak kelompok: Dalam penelitian pre-eksperimental, kelompok subjek biasanya dipilih berdasarkan kemudahan dan ketersediaan mereka. Hal ini dapat menyebabkan subjek yang dipilih tidak mewakili populasi secara keseluruhan dan menghasilkan bias dalam penelitian.
Tidak dapat mengukur perubahan: Karena penelitian pre-eksperimental hanya mengukur kelompok subjek pada satu titik waktu sebelum dan sesudah intervensi, penelitian ini tidak dapat mengukur perubahan dalam jangka waktu yang lebih lama.
Tidak dapat membandingkan hasil: Tanpa kelompok kontrol atau kelompok perbandingan, penelitian pre-eksperimental tidak dapat membandingkan hasil intervensi dengan hasil yang mungkin terjadi jika tidak ada intervensi.
Tidak mempertimbangkan faktor eksternal: Dalam penelitian pre-eksperimental, faktor eksternal seperti faktor lingkungan atau situasional yang dapat mempengaruhi hasil penelitian tidak dapat dikontrol atau diukur secara tepat. Hal ini dapat menyebabkan hasil penelitian yang tidak akurat atau tidak valid.
Namun, meskipun memiliki kelemahan, penelitian pre-eksperimental masih dapat memberikan informasi awal tentang efektivitas intervensi yang diteliti dan dapat memberikan dasar untuk penelitian lebih lanjut dengan desain penelitian yang lebih kuat.
surat An-Nahl ayat 68-69: Perumpamaan seorang Mukmin itu seperti Lebah
.jpg)
Perumpamaan seorang mukmin sebagai lebah adalah sebuah perumpamaan yang sering diambil dari Al-Quran, dalam surat An-Nahl ayat 68-69:
"Dan Tuhanmu mewahyukan kepada lebah: "Buatlah sarang di bukit-bukit, di pohon-pohon kayu, dan tempat-tempat yang dibuat manusia. Kemudian makanlah dari tiap-tiap (macam) buah-buahan dan tempuhlah jalan Tuhanmu yang telah dimudahkan (bagimu)." Dari perut lebah itu keluar minuman (madu) yang bermacam-macam warnanya, di dalamnya terdapat obat yang menyembuhkan bagi manusia. Sesungguhnya pada yang demikian itu benar-benar terdapat tanda (kebesaran Allah) bagi orang-orang yang memikirkan."
Dalam perumpamaan ini, lebah diibaratkan sebagai seorang mukmin yang setia dalam melaksanakan tugas-tugasnya untuk mengumpulkan nektar dari bunga-bunga dan membuat madu. Lebah juga diibaratkan sebagai orang yang bertanggung jawab, selalu bekerja keras dan memanfaatkan segala sumber daya yang tersedia untuk mencapai tujuan mereka.
Lebah juga diibaratkan sebagai orang yang berkontribusi pada kehidupan manusia dengan memproduksi madu yang mengandung berbagai macam nutrisi dan obat-obatan alami. Begitu juga seorang mukmin, harus berkontribusi pada masyarakat dengan memberikan manfaat dan menjadi teladan yang baik bagi orang lain.
Dengan perumpamaan ini, Allah SWT mengajarkan kepada kita untuk selalu bekerja keras, bertanggung jawab, dan memberikan manfaat bagi orang lain.
Perumpamaan seorang mukmin sebagai lebah yang memakan yang baik, keluar darinya yang baik, dan tidak merusak lingkungan sekitarnya memang sangat tepat. Seperti yang telah dijelaskan sebelumnya, lebah adalah makhluk yang selalu bekerja keras dan memanfaatkan sumber daya yang tersedia untuk mencapai tujuan mereka.
Dalam hal makanan, lebah hanya memilih nektar bunga yang berkualitas tinggi dan mengandung banyak nutrisi, sehingga madu yang dihasilkan memiliki kualitas yang baik dan bermanfaat bagi manusia. Begitu juga dengan seorang mukmin, ia harus memilih makanan yang baik dan halal, serta memperhatikan kualitas makanannya agar tubuhnya sehat dan kuat untuk beribadah.
Selain itu, lebah juga sangat teliti dalam membuat sarang dan memproduksi madu, sehingga madu yang dihasilkan tidak hanya bermanfaat bagi manusia, tetapi juga tidak merusak lingkungan sekitarnya. Seorang mukmin juga harus menjadi orang yang teliti dan bertanggung jawab dalam melakukan segala sesuatu, sehingga tidak merusak atau merugikan orang lain.
Dalam Islam, dijelaskan bahwa seorang mukmin harus selalu berusaha untuk memperbaiki diri dan lingkungannya, serta memberikan manfaat bagi sesama manusia dan makhluk hidup lainnya. Dengan perumpamaan ini, Allah SWT mengajarkan kepada kita untuk menjadi orang yang baik dan bermanfaat bagi lingkungan sekitar, seperti lebah yang bekerja keras dan menghasilkan manfaat yang banyak bagi manusia.
erumpamaan ini berasal dari analogi yang ditemukan dalam Al-Quran, surat An-Nahl ayat 68-69, yang telah dijelaskan sebelumnya.
Namun, terdapat hadits yang berkaitan dengan nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam perumpamaan tersebut. Sebagai contoh, hadits yang diriwayatkan oleh Imam Bukhari dan Imam Muslim, dari Abdullah bin Umar ra., bahwa Rasulullah SAW bersabda:
"Seorang muslim adalah saudara bagi muslim yang lain, dan tidaklah boleh ia menzalimi saudaranya, mengecewakannya, atau meninggalkannya dalam keadaan terdesak. Siapa yang membantu saudaranya dalam keadaan terdesak, maka Allah akan membantunya dalam keadaan terdesak. Siapa yang meringankan beban orang yang ditimpanya, maka Allah akan meringankan beban baginya pada hari kiamat. Siapa yang menutupi kekurangan seorang muslim, maka Allah akan menutupi kekurangannya di dunia dan akhirat." (HR. Bukhari dan Muslim)
Hadits ini menegaskan pentingnya saling membantu dan menolong di antara umat muslim, serta menjadi teladan yang baik bagi orang lain. Hal ini sejalan dengan nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam perumpamaan seorang mukmin sebagai lebah yang selalu bekerja keras dan memberikan manfaat bagi lingkungan sekitarnya.
source: Mukmin seperti Lebah. (openai.com)
THE COMPANION: Ka’b bin Zuhair - A Poet of Arab Jahiliyyah Embrac...
THE COMPANION: Ka’b bin Zuhair - A Poet of Arab Jahiliyyah Embrac...: Ka’b bin Zuhair bin Abi Sulma. Ka‘b ibn Zuhair (Arabic: كعب بن زهير) was an Arabian poet of the 7th century, and a contemporary of Rasu...
ANALISIS APPRAISAL TEKS EDITORIAL PANGUDARASA DALAM MAJALAH PANJEBAR SEMANGAT
DOI:10.20961/PRASASTI.V5I2.39456
Corpus ID: 228852412
ANALISIS APPRAISAL TEKS EDITORIAL PANGUDARASA DALAM MAJALAH PANJEBAR SEMANGAT
This article explores Pangudarasa’s editorial texts in the Panjebar Semangat magazine by using a systemic theory of functional linguistics particularly an appraisal analysis of texts. The objectives of this research are (1) to identify the appraisal tools in Pangudarasa’s editorial texts in a Javanese magazine called Panjebar Semangat, and (2) to describe the perceptions of Pangudarasa’s editorial text writers in the Panjebar Semangat magazine. This descriptive qualitative research used a qualitative method along with a content analysis platform. The data pertaining to words, phrases, clauses, and sentences coincided with appraisal tools. The data source was derived from the Panjebar Semangat magazine, which was published on December 21, 2019 entitled Kasus Garuda, Wanci Kang Pas Kanggo Ngresiki BUMN. The data analysis used a method of referential matching tools to determine a phenomenon beyond the language. The results of data analysis show that (1) appraisal tools in the editorial texts of Pangudarasa in the Panjebar Semangat magazine dominantly present appreciation (42.55%), judgment (36.17%) and affect (21.28%), and (2) the pattern of writers' perceptions to support the Minister Erick Thohir's decision in handling the Garuda Airlines case. This support is reinforced by the use of language functions to influence others by assessing a case directly and authors of editorial texts have a tendency to tell sensitive things or issues mainly concerned with events in the community.
logic of discourse in systemic functional linguistics
CHAT GPT, tell me logic of discourse in systemic functional linguistics
In systemic functional linguistics (SFL), discourse is defined as language above the sentence level, which includes text and context. SFL views discourse as a social practice, where language is used to achieve communicative purposes in particular social contexts.
The logic of discourse in SFL is based on the notion of genre and register. Genre refers to the structured patterns of language use that are associated with specific social activities, such as academic research articles, news reports, or personal letters. Register, on the other hand, refers to the linguistic choices that are made by speakers or writers to create a particular social identity and to achieve specific communicative purposes within a particular genre.
According to SFL, discourse is structured at three levels: text, discourse semantics, and social context.
At the text level, SFL describes how the linguistic choices made by speakers or writers create a coherent and cohesive text that can be understood by the reader or listener. The text level includes the analysis of grammatical structure, such as the use of verbs, nouns, and prepositions, and how they contribute to the meaning of the text.
At the discourse semantic level, SFL analyzes how the text relates to the broader social context in which it is produced. This includes the analysis of the relationships between different parts of the text, such as how one sentence or clause relates to another, and how they contribute to the overall meaning of the text.
At the social context level, SFL describes how the text is situated within a particular social context, such as the culture, ideology, and power relations that influence language use. This level includes the analysis of the social purpose of the text and the social roles of the participants in the discourse.
Overall, the logic of discourse in SFL emphasizes the social nature of language use and how linguistic choices are shaped by social context and communicative purposes.
tell me logic of discourse in systemic functional linguistics
PERPLEXITY
View Detailed
Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is a theory of language that provides concrete methods for analyzing discourse. According to the SFL model, all languages have formed into three summed-up implications: ideational, interpersonal, and textual. The ideational function is concerned with the representation of experience, the interpersonal function is concerned with the negotiation of social relations, and the textual function is concerned with the organization of discourse. The SFL model emphasizes the importance of context in the analysis of discourse, and it provides a framework for analyzing the ways in which language is used to create meaning in social contexts
[2].
The logic of discourse in systemic functional linguistics (SFL) is based on the assumption that language is a social semiotic system that is organized by choices at different levels of abstraction. SFL proposes that discourse can be analyzed in terms of three metafunctions: ideational, interpersonal, and textual. Each metafunction corresponds to a different aspect of meaning: the representation of experience, the expression of stance and attitude, and the organization of information. SFL also distinguishes between different strata of language: context, semantics, lexicogrammar, and phonology/graphology. Discourse analysis within SFL involves relating the choices made at the semantic stratum to the contextual features that motivate them, as well as to the lexicogrammatical and phonological/graphological resources that realize them.
There are various models of discourse analysis within SFL that focus on different semantic systems and their relations to context and text. Some of the most influential models are Hasan's register analysis, Gregory's phase analysis, Martin's discourse semantics, Mann, Thompson, and Matthiessen's rhetorical structure theory, and Matthiessen's appliable discourse analysis. These models differ in their scope, methodology, and theoretical assumptions, but they share a common interest in exploring how language users make meaning through choices in discourse. SFL also offers a framework for multimodal discourse analysis, which extends the systemic functional approach to other semiotic resources such as images, sounds, gestures, and actions.
SFL's logic of discourse is not without its challenges and criticisms. Some of the issues that have been raised include the complexity and diversity of the models, the lack of empirical validation and generalization, the textualist orientation and neglect of sociolinguistic factors, and the limited engagement with other approaches to discourse analysis. Despite these limitations, SFL remains a powerful and productive theory for understanding how language works as a social semiotic system in discourse.
Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is a theory of language that considers language as a social semiotic system that is used for meaning-making in social contexts1. SFL has a particular focus on discourse analysis and provides a framework for analyzing social context as well as discourse2. SFL proposes that language is organized into three main metafunctions: ideational, interpersonal, and textual1. The ideational metafunction refers to how language is used to represent experience and construct meanings about the world. The interpersonal metafunction refers to how language is used to enact social relationships and negotiate meaning between speakers. The textual metafunction refers to how language is used to create coherent texts that are appropriate for specific contexts1.
Discourse semantics in SFL refers to the study of how meaning is constructed through discourse, including how speakers use language to negotiate meaning and construct social relationships1. Discourse semantics includes systems such as negotiation, appraisal, conjunction, ideation, identification, and periodicity1. These systems are positioned within the overall architecture of SFL in terms of stratification and metafunction1.
I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
Received message. Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is a theory of language that considers language as a social semiotic system that is used for meaning-making in social contexts. SFL has a particular focus on discourse analysis and provides a framework for analyzing social context as well as discourse. SFL proposes that language is organized into three main metafunctions: ideational, interpersonal, and textual. The ideational metafunction refers to how language is used to represent experience and construct meanings about the world. The interpersonal metafunction refers to how language is used to enact social relationships and negotiate meaning between speakers. The textual metafunction refers to how language is used to create coherent texts that are appropriate for specific contexts. Discourse semantics in SFL refers to the study of how meaning is constructed through discourse, including how speakers use language to negotiate meaning and construct social relationships. Discourse semantics includes systems such as negotiation, appraisal, conjunction, ideation, identification, and periodicity. These systems are positioned within the overall architecture of SFL in terms of stratification and metafunction. I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
Learn more:
2 million people have already chosen AdSense
2 million people have already chosen AdSense
.jpg)
here's why:
Earn from your site, Earn from your site
Millions of advertisers compete for your ad space. That means more money, more relevant ads, and more ad space filled.
Improve your user experience, Ads are optimized for mobile
Google can optimize the size of your ad units to automatically adapt to desktop or mobile, which means there's more opportunities for those ad units to be seen and clicked.
Saving time
Add just one piece of code to your site and Google will automatically show ads that match your site's layout, saving you time as you don't have to make many changes to your ad code.
BOOST INCOME
See your earning potential from AdSense. Select your site category and site visitor region to see your earning potential.
BENEFIT 1
Only the highest-paying ads will be shown
Increase your revenue by leveraging the largest network of online advertisers bidding on your ad space.
The right ad for your audience
Ads are curated to ensure they are of high quality and relevant to your content or audience, even when viewed from smartphones and tablets. The result? You can increase your income online.
BENEFIT 2
You are in control
Block ads you don't like, customize where ads appear, and choose the type of ad that best fits your site.
Benefit 3
"You only need to place a small amount of AdSense code onto your site, and it works immediately after" Jack Herrick, Founder, and CEO of WikiHow.
Promoting a World Englishes Perspective through Podcasts
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Promoting a World Englishes Perspective through Podcasts | ELT Journal | Oxford Academic (oup.com)
Promoting a World Englishes Perspective through Podcasts
Hanung Triyoko, Tabitha Kidwell
ELT Journal, ccad002,
Promoting a World Englishes Perspective through Podcasts | ELT Journal | Oxford Academic (oup.com)
Promoting a World Englishes Perspective through Podcasts
Hanung Triyoko, Tabitha Kidwell
ELT Journal, ccad002,
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad002
Published:
06 April 2023
Extract
Issue Section: The View From Here
Published:
06 April 2023
Extract
As the most widely studied and spoken language worldwide, English is a medium of communication between speakers of varied language backgrounds. Global English users need not converge on any one variety; rather, they need adaptive, flexible skills that support communication with speakers of diverse World English (WE) varieties (Kirkpartick 2007). Nevertheless, many English learners and teachers around the world continue to adhere to ‘native speaker’1 models that prioritize language varieties from English-dominant nations, such as the United States or the United Kingdom (Tseng 2019). We have encountered this perspective first-hand in our work in Indonesia.
Hanung has taught English and trained teachers at an Islamic University in Central Java for over twenty years. Tabitha has nearly twenty years of experience in ELT, including three years as a visiting instructor at Hanung’s institution. Among the students and teachers we have worked with in Central Java, the dominant language learning model is the ‘native English speaker’. For instance, on a survey given to our first-year English-major students, 81 percent reported wanting to ‘sound like a native speaker’. To challenge this tendency, Simanjuntak and Lien (2021) encourage the use of materials from global and local language communities. Using diverse listening materials can help students understand a wide variety of language varieties and accents and adapt to dialects they have never encountered before. We found podcasts, free audio recordings which are automatically delivered to users’ devices, to be a particularly rich and convenient source of listening materials featuring WE speakers. In the sections below, we describe our teaching context and use of podcasts. We close by discussing how our approach could transfer to other contexts where students and teachers continue to aspire to ‘native speaker’ models, and offer recommendations for teachers interested in shifting to a WE approach and exposing students to varied linguistic norms through podcasts.
Promoting a World Englishes Perspective through Podcasts | ELT Journal | Oxford Academic (oup.com)Issue Section: The View From Here
EXPLAIN IN DETAIL HETEROGLOSS ENGAGEMENT IN SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS
Heterogloss is a term used in systemic functional linguistics (SFL) to describe the presence of multiple voices or perspectives in a text1. Heteroglossic engagement is one of the two types of engagement in SFL, which comprises two sub-systems: dialogic contraction and dialogic expansion1. Dialogic contraction is intended to suppress, replace, reject, or challenge the alternative position and voice. Meanwhile, dialogic expansion is intended to entertain or attribute2.
In SFL, language is viewed as a social semiotic system that functions to make meaning in context of situation3. It was devised by Michael Halliday, who took the notion of system from J. R. Firth, his teacher (Halliday, 1961). Firth proposed that systems refer to possibilities subordinated to structure; Halliday “liberated” choice from structure and made it a central concept.
I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other questions.
Received message. Heterogloss is a term used in systemic functional linguistics (SFL) to describe the presence of multiple voices or perspectives in a text. Heteroglossic engagement is one of the two types of engagement in SFL, which comprises two sub-systems: dialogic contraction and dialogic expansion. Dialogic contraction is intended to suppress, replace, reject, or challenge the alternative position and voice. Meanwhile, dialogic expansion is intended to entertain or attribute. In SFL, language is viewed as a social semiotic system that functions to make meaning in context of situation. It was devised by Michael Halliday, who took the notion of system from J. R. Firth, his teacher (Halliday, 1961). Firth proposed that systems refer to possibilities subordinated to structure; Halliday "liberated" choice from structure and made it a central concept. I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other questions.
Learn more:
3of20
Heteroglossic engagement is a concept that refers to the way in which an author engages with and positions themselves in relation to other voices in a discourse
[1]. It is a term that is used in systemic functional linguistics (SFL) to describe the way in which language is used to create meaning and convey social relationships
[2]. SFL is a theory of language that focuses on the relationship between language and social context
[3]. It is based on the idea that language is a social semiotic system that is used to make meaning in different contexts
[3].The concept of heteroglossia is central to SFL. It refers to the idea that language is always made up of multiple voices or discourses
[3]. These voices can be from different social groups, different historical periods, or different genres of discourse
[3]. Heteroglossia is seen as a fundamental aspect of language use, and it is closely related to the concept of dialogism, which refers to the way in which language is used to create a dialogue between different voices
[3].In SFL, the concept of engagement is used to describe the way in which language is used to position the author in relation to other voices in a discourse
[4]. Engagement can be seen as a way of expressing the author's attitude towards the content of the discourse, as well as towards the audience and the context in which the discourse is taking place
[4]. The appraisal framework is used in SFL to analyze the way in which language is used to express attitudes and values
[4]. It is based on the idea that language is used to evaluate things in the world, and that these evaluations are expressed through different linguistic resources such as modality, polarity, and affect
[4].Overall, heteroglossic engagement is a concept that is central to SFL. It refers to the way in which language is used to create meaning and convey social relationships, and it is closely related to the concepts of heteroglossia, dialogism, and engagement. The appraisal framework is used in SFL to analyze the way in which language is used to express attitudes and values.
4 SOURCES
View List 1 
danielfryer
2 
sciencedirect 3 
academypublication 4 
sagepub
RELATED
what is the difference between heteroglossic engagement and monoglossic engagement
how is heteroglossic engagement used in legal writing
what is the appraisal framework from systemic functional linguistics
EXPLAIN IN DETAIL HETEROGLOSS ENGAGEMENT SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS
PERPLEXITY
View Concise
Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is an approach to linguistics that considers language as a social semiotic system
[1]. SFL was devised by Michael Halliday, who took the notion of system from J.R. Firth, his teacher
[1]. Firth proposed that systems refer to possibilities subordinated to structure, while Halliday "liberated" choice from structure and made it the central organizing dimension of SFL
[1]. The functional aspect of SFL signifies that language evolved under the pressure of the functions that the language system must serve
[1]. Functions are taken to have left their mark on the structure and organization of language at all levels, which is achieved via metafunctions
[1]. Metafunction is uniquely defined as the use of language to make meaning in three different ways: ideational, interpersonal, and textual
[1].The engagement system is a part of the interpersonal metafunction of SFL
[2]. It refers to the ways in which speakers position themselves and others in relation to the discourse
[2]. The engagement system is divided into two categories: monogloss and heterogloss
[2]. Monogloss refers to the use of a single language variety, while heterogloss refers to the use of multiple language varieties
[2]. Heteroglossia is a concept that was introduced by the Russian philosopher and literary critic Mikhail Bakhtin
[3]. It refers to the coexistence of multiple voices or discourses within a single text or conversation
[3]. In SFL, heteroglossia is used to describe the use of multiple language varieties within a single text or conversation
[2].The use of heterogloss in discourse can have different effects depending on the context
[4]. In some cases, it can be used to provide examples for pure narratives, while in other cases, it can be used to highlight the validity of different positions
[4]. The engagement system is also used to analyze the text of the law
[5]. A study that employed the theory of SFL with the parameter of the category of Appraisal found that the pattern of the lexical means conveying positioning used in the text of UU ITE tended to be Engagement ∧ Heterogloss
[5]. Based on the design form or structure, the lexical means conveying Engagement in UU ITE was dominantly found in Chapter 1
[5].
5 SOURCES
View List 1 
wikipedia 2 
degruyter
3 
researchgate 4 
nih 5 
knepublishing
Heteroglossia, engagement, and systemic functional linguistics (SFL) are all important concepts in linguistics that are interconnected in a powerful way. In this explanation, we will explore each of these concepts and their relationship to SFL.
Heteroglossia is a term coined by Russian literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin to describe the coexistence of multiple language varieties or "voices" within a single linguistic community. Bakhtin argued that all utterances are necessarily embedded in a social and historical context and that language is inherently dialogic, meaning that speakers are always engaged in a conversation with the linguistic community around them. Heteroglossia recognizes the diversity of language use within a community and the importance of understanding how these different voices interact with each other.
Engagement is another important concept in linguistics that refers to the ways in which speakers position themselves in relation to their interlocutors and the wider social context. This includes both the content of the message being conveyed and the way in which it is conveyed. For example, a speaker may use a formal register to signal respect or deference to a listener, or they may use humor to create a sense of rapport or intimacy.
Systemic functional linguistics (SFL) is a framework for analyzing language that emphasizes the functional nature of language and its relationship to social context. SFL posits that language is a social semiotic system that serves a variety of communicative purposes, such as informing, persuading, entertaining, or establishing social relationships. SFL emphasizes the importance of analyzing language at multiple levels, including phonology, grammar, lexis, and discourse, and seeks to understand how these different levels interact to create meaning.
In SFL, heteroglossia and engagement are seen as fundamental aspects of language use that can help to explain how meaning is created and negotiated in different contexts. Heteroglossia is important because it recognizes the diversity of voices within a community and how these different voices interact with each other. Engagement is important because it helps to explain how speakers position themselves in relation to their interlocutors and the wider social context.
Together, these concepts provide a powerful framework for understanding how language functions in social contexts. By analyzing the various voices and registers that are present within a community, and the ways in which speakers use these voices to engage with their interlocutors, we can gain a deeper understanding of how meaning is created and negotiated in different social contexts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)