what is the difference between MONOGLOSS and HETEROGLOSS in appraisal systemic functional linguistics?


In systemic functional linguistics (SFL), monogloss and heterogloss are terms used to describe different types of appraisal resources or evaluative language.

  1. Monogloss: Monogloss refers to the use of a single evaluative resource or a consistent evaluative stance throughout a text. It represents a unified and consistent perspective or attitude expressed by the speaker or writer. In monogloss, there is a coherent and focused evaluation that aligns with a particular position or viewpoint. It creates a sense of stability and uniformity in the evaluative language used. An example of monogloss would be a text that consistently expresses a positive evaluation of a product, such as a review that praises its features and benefits.

  2. Heterogloss: Heterogloss, on the other hand, refers to the presence of multiple evaluative resources or conflicting evaluative stances within a text. It reflects a diversity of perspectives, attitudes, or evaluations expressed by the speaker or writer. Heterogloss allows for different voices, opinions, or evaluations to coexist within a discourse. It often occurs in texts that involve contrasting viewpoints, debates, or conflicting evaluations. For instance, in an argumentative essay discussing the pros and cons of a particular topic, there may be heterogloss as different evaluations are presented and debated.

In summary, monogloss represents a single evaluative resource or a consistent evaluative stance, while heterogloss involves the presence of multiple evaluative resources or conflicting evaluative stances within a text. These concepts help to analyze and understand the complexity and diversity of evaluative language used in communication.

Here are examples of news texts illustrating monogloss and heterogloss in appraisal from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics (SFL):

  1. Monogloss: Headline: "New Study Shows Significant Decrease in Unemployment Rates" Text: The recently published study reveals a substantial decline in unemployment rates across the country. The findings indicate that the government's economic policies have been effective in generating job opportunities and stimulating economic growth. Experts are optimistic about the future prospects of the job market, considering this positive trend.

In this example, the news text consistently employs a positive evaluation of the study's findings and the government's economic policies. The monogloss reflects a unified and consistent evaluative stance throughout the text, emphasizing the positive impact on unemployment rates.

  1. Heterogloss: Headline: "Controversial Immigration Bill Sparks Heated Debate in Parliament" Text: The proposed immigration bill has triggered a contentious and polarizing discussion among lawmakers. Proponents argue that stricter immigration regulations are necessary to protect national security and preserve job opportunities for citizens. However, critics claim that the bill is discriminatory and undermines humanitarian values. The debate continues as both sides present contrasting evaluations and passionately defend their positions.

In this example, the news text exhibits heterogloss as it presents divergent evaluations and conflicting viewpoints regarding the immigration bill. The language used reflects a range of evaluations expressed by different stakeholders involved in the debate, highlighting the diversity of opinions and perspectives.

These examples illustrate how monogloss and heterogloss can be observed in news texts, with monogloss reflecting a consistent evaluative stance and heterogloss representing the presence of multiple evaluative resources and conflicting evaluations.

what is the difference between focus and force in appraisal systemic functional linguistics?

 


In systemic functional linguistics, focus and force are two important concepts related to appraisal, which refers to the evaluation and attitude expressed in language.

  1. Focus: Focus in appraisal refers to the evaluative content or the target of the evaluation in a statement. It involves highlighting or directing attention to specific elements or aspects within the text. Focus can be positive, negative, or neutral, and it helps convey the attitude or judgment of the speaker or writer. For example, in the statement "She is an exceptional singer," the focus is on the quality of being exceptional, indicating a positive evaluation.

  2. Force: Force, on the other hand, refers to the strength or intensity of the evaluation or attitude expressed. It reflects the degree of certainty, commitment, or conviction of the speaker or writer towards their evaluation. Force can be realized through linguistic features such as modal verbs, adverbs, or intensifiers. For instance, the statement "He is definitely guilty" expresses a strong force with the inclusion of the adverb "definitely," indicating a high level of conviction in the negative evaluation of guilt.

In summary, focus determines the target or content of evaluation in appraisal, while force indicates the strength or intensity of the evaluation expressed. Both focus and force contribute to the overall evaluative meaning conveyed in a statement or text.

pics penyemangat menyelesaikan studi S1, S2 & S3

 








Appraisal-SFL Again

 


Appraisal theory is a key aspect of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) that focuses on how language is used to express attitudes, emotions, and evaluations. Appraisal theory is concerned with the ways in which speakers and writers evaluate things, people, and events, and how they use language to do so.

At its core, appraisal theory is based on the idea that language is not only used to convey information, but also to express attitudes and evaluations. According to SFL, the language we use to express our attitudes and evaluations is organized into three main systems: the attitudinal system, the affective system, and the judgemental system.

The attitudinal system is concerned with our attitudes towards people, things, and events. It includes resources such as adjectives, adverbs, and verbs that are used to express our feelings and opinions. For example, saying that something is "amazing" or "terrible" is an expression of our attitude towards it.

The affective system is concerned with our emotions and feelings. It includes resources such as interjections and exclamations that are used to express our emotional responses. For example, "Wow!" or "Oh no!" are expressions of our emotional reactions.

The judgemental system is concerned with the evaluation of people, things, and events. It includes resources such as modal verbs, evaluative adjectives, and adverbs that are used to express our judgments about things. For example, saying that something is "good" or "bad" is a judgement about its quality.

By analyzing the language used in texts, SFL scholars can identify how speakers or writers evaluate things, people, and events. This can provide insights into the social and cultural values that underpin a particular discourse or text, and the ways in which language is used to express power, authority, and ideology.


 Let's take a sentence from a news article as an example:

"The new policy has been widely criticized by environmental groups."

Applying appraisal theory to this sentence, we can identify the following:

- Attitude: "widely criticized" expresses a negative attitude towards the new policy.

- Judgment: "widely criticized" is a judgment about the quality of the new policy.

- Graduation: "widely" implies that the criticism is not just a few isolated voices, but rather a significant and widespread response.

In this way, we can see that the language used in this sentence expresses a negative evaluation of the new policy and implies that the criticism is significant and widespread. This can provide insights into the stance of the author or the news outlet towards the policy, as well as the stance of the environmental groups who are criticizing it.

By analyzing the language used in this way, we can gain a deeper understanding of the attitudes and values that are being expressed in the text, and the ways in which language is being used to persuade or influence the reader.

explainpaper.com and one stop AI at poe.com

 


https://www.explainpaper.com/  aplikasi untuk upload pdf dan dijelaskan intinya oleh AI.

and a collection of AI in one-stop website Sage - Poehttps://poe.com/