Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Stabilized interlanguage patterns and fossilization risks in Indonesian EFL academic writing: A qualitative error analysis





Stabilized interlanguage patterns and fossilization risks in Indonesian EFL academic writing: A qualitative error analysis | Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching

Keywords: academic writing, error analysis, EFL learners, fossilization risks, stabilized interlanguage

Abstract


Stabilized interlanguage remains a persistent concern in second language acquisition, particularly in the academic writing of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners who have received years of formal instruction. Although interlanguage stabilization has been widely discussed in SLA scholarship, less attention has been given to how it appears in the academic writing of advanced Indonesian EFL learners. This study addresses this gap by examining recurrent lexico-syntactic, grammatical, and discourse-level errors that may indicate stabilized interlanguage patterns and fossilization risks. Using a qualitative descriptive design, the study involved seven undergraduate EFL learners from an Indonesian university who were selected purposively based on their experience in academic essay writing. Data were collected through controlled argumentative writing tasks and analyzed using error analysis supported by thematic coding. The findings show recurring problems in article use, prepositional choice, cohesion devices, nominalization, verb form, collocation, and academic register. These patterns suggest that some learners were able to communicate their intended meanings, yet still relied on non-target-like forms that had become familiar in their writing. The study also indicates that such patterns may be shaped by first-language transfer, limited noticing, insufficient corrective feedback, and repeated use of communicatively acceptable expressions. The findings highlight the need for discourse-level feedback, genre-based instruction, and targeted pedagogical support that helps learners notice, revise, and move beyond stabilized patterns. This study contributes to SLA and EFL writing research by situating fossilization risks within Indonesian higher education academic writing in university contexts.

Pak Fay New Blog: https://litapdimas.kemenag.go.id/index.php/

Pak Fay New Blog: https://litapdimas.kemenag.go.id/index.php/:   Litapdimas | Kementerian Agama RI https://litapdimas.kemenag.go.id/index.php/

Blog Dr. Faizal Risdianto: Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies in Lecturer...

Blog Dr. Faizal Risdianto: Politeness and Impoliteness Strategies in Lecturer...: Faizal Risdianto, Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga Machfudz Machfudz, Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga Eka Margianti Sagimin, Universitas ...

Monday, June 29, 2026

PegiatJurnal.com: Link SIAKAD atau LINK AKADEMIK DOSEN UIN Salatiga

PegiatJurnal.com: Link SIAKAD atau LINK AKADEMIK DOSEN UIN Salatiga: Link SIAKAD atau LINK AKADEMIK DOSEN UIN Salatiga https://siakad.uinsalatiga.ac.id/dosen/ at January 04, 2024 Email This BlogThis! Share ...

Content Analysis and Genre Theory in English Language Education: A Systematic Framework for Textbook Analysis

 Content analysis has become one of the most widely employed qualitative research methods for investigating textual data across education, linguistics, communication, and social sciences. The method enables researchers to examine documents systematically, objectively, and transparently while identifying patterns of meaning embedded within texts. Unlike casual document review, content analysis follows rigorous procedures that ensure findings are valid, reliable, and replicable. Krippendorff (2019) defines content analysis as a research technique for making replicable and valid inferences from texts and other meaningful materials within their contexts of use. This definition highlights two important characteristics of content analysis. First, it does not merely describe visible textual information but also seeks to interpret underlying meanings and contextual relationships. Second, the analytical process is conducted systematically using explicit coding procedures that allow different researchers to reach comparable conclusions. Consequently, content analysis has become particularly valuable in educational research, especially in studies examining curriculum documents, textbooks, classroom materials, and instructional policies (Neuendorf, 2017; Schreier, 2012).

Among the various approaches to document analysis, qualitative content analysis has received increasing scholarly attention because of its ability to explore both explicit and implicit meanings contained in textual data. Rather than relying solely on numerical frequencies, qualitative content analysis emphasizes careful reading, systematic coding, categorization, and interpretation of textual information. According to Assarroudi et al. (2018), qualitative content analysis is a structured analytical approach that identifies categories and themes through systematic coding while preserving the contextual meaning of the data. Similarly, Schreier (2012) argues that qualitative content analysis balances descriptive and interpretive perspectives by allowing researchers to organize complex textual information into meaningful conceptual categories. This dual nature enables researchers not only to describe textual characteristics but also to explain the relationships among emerging concepts. Consequently, qualitative content analysis has become increasingly popular in educational research where understanding meaning, context, and interpretation is often more important than merely counting textual elements.

Recent methodological developments further demonstrate that content analysis possesses substantial capacity for managing large and complex datasets without sacrificing analytical rigor. Advances in qualitative research have enabled scholars to analyze extensive collections of documents, policy texts, educational materials, digital resources, and online communications using systematic coding procedures. Mozersky et al. (2022) explain that content analysis effectively combines data reduction with interpretive analysis by organizing large volumes of information into meaningful categories and themes. Through systematic coding, researchers can simplify complex textual data while preserving essential contextual information, thereby revealing relationships among categories, concepts, and broader theoretical frameworks. This ability to integrate organization and interpretation makes content analysis particularly suitable for textbook research, where multiple chapters, learning activities, and instructional materials must be examined comprehensively without overlooking important contextual meanings.

Overall, content analysis can be understood as a systematic, objective, transparent, and interpretive research method for examining textual information through structured coding, categorization, and contextual interpretation. The analytical process allows researchers to identify recurring concepts, classify textual patterns, interpret communicative meanings, and generate theoretically grounded conclusions from documentary evidence (Krippendorff, 2019; Neuendorf, 2017). Because English language textbooks consist of numerous instructional texts representing different communicative purposes, content analysis provides an appropriate methodological framework for identifying language genres, analyzing their distribution, and evaluating their pedagogical functions. Through systematic examination of textbook content, researchers can explain how instructional materials represent language learning objectives while maintaining methodological rigor and analytical transparency.