Friday, February 20, 2026

Ekosistem Publikasi Berkelanjutan di PTKI (Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam)

 Ekosistem Publikasi Berkelanjutan di PTKI (Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam) merupakan kerangka strategis untuk membangun budaya menulis akademik yang berkelanjutan, meningkatkan praktik sitasi yang etis, serta memaksimalkan dampak pengetahuan terhadap masyarakat dan kebijakan. Konsep ini menjawab tantangan utama di PTKI, seperti rendahnya kultur menulis, gap sitasi, dan dampak riset yang terbatas. [pakfaizal](https://www.pakfaizal.com/2026/02/ekosistem-publikasi-berkelanjutan.html)


## Tantangan Utama

PTKI sering menghadapi kultur menulis yang lemah, di mana menulis dianggap hanya tugas akhir seperti skripsi, bukan bagian dari gaya hidup akademik. Karya ilmiah dosen dan mahasiswa kurang tersitasi karena visibilitas rendah dan kebiasaan merujuk literatur ter…

[17:14, 20/02/2026] Pak Faizal: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta telah menerapkan ekosistem publikasi berkelanjutan melalui penguatan riset dosen, pengelolaan jurnal berkualitas, dan kolaborasi eksternal, yang menghasilkan dampak internasional tinggi. Pada 2025, kampus ini mencatat 236 publikasi Scopus, termasuk 57,3% di jurnal Q1, dengan 977 sitasi pada 2024 dan FWCI 2,68 (dua kali rata-rata global). [pakfaizal](https://www.pakfaizal.com/2026/02/ekosistem-publikasi-berkelanjutan.html)

The Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation condemned President Prabowo Subianto’s attendance at the inaugural summit of the Board of Peace

 


The Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (YLBHI) has condemned President Prabowo Subianto’s attendance at the inaugural summit of the Board of Peace (BoP) in Washington, D.C., on February 19, 2026. The organization urged Indonesia to withdraw from the U.S.-initiated council, arguing that Indonesia’s involvement reflects confusion in Prabowo’s foreign policy and downplays alleged humanitarian crimes committed by the United States and Israel against Palestine.

YLBHI stated that Indonesia, as the current President of the UN Human Rights Council, should prioritize established international legal mechanisms instead of joining an organization that, according to them, lacks a clear human rights framework. The foundation emphasized that Indonesia has historically supported Palestinian independence and should remain consistent with constitutional principles opposing colonialism and supporting self-determination.

The group outlined four main concerns:

  1. Undermining international human rights law and damaging Indonesia’s credibility as President of the UN Human Rights Council, particularly after former U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly dismissed the importance of international law.

  2. Contradicting Indonesia’s longstanding support for Palestine, especially since Israel is a member of the Board of Peace. YLBHI also criticized plans to deploy Indonesian troops to assist demilitarization efforts in Gaza.

  3. Ignoring International Criminal Court (ICC) accountability, noting that the ICC has indicated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may bear responsibility for war crimes in Gaza.

  4. Lack of human rights mechanisms within the Board of Peace, which YLBHI claims is not based on international law and lacks transparency and accountability.

YLBHI further criticized the shrinking civic space in Indonesia during Prabowo’s presidency, citing increasing restrictions on civil liberties.

Despite the criticism, President Prabowo stated that Indonesia joined the Board of Peace to help advance a sustainable peace solution in Gaza and to support the continuation of the ceasefire.

SOURCE: tempo.co/politik/ylbhi-kecam-kehadiran-prabowo-dalam-ktt-dewan-perdamaian-2116305

Thursday, February 19, 2026

SCOPUS ID DR. FAIZAL RISDIANTO

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57213518975
Risdianto, Faizal

Framing the Coverage of the Lebanon Conflict: An Entman Framing Analysis of AP News, Reuters, and The Guardian’s Reporting on Israeli Attacks on Beirut



Framing the Coverage of the Lebanon Conflict: An Entman Framing Analysis of AP News, Reuters, and The Guardian’s Reporting on Israeli Attacks on Beirut
Authors
Nazifatul Mardiah, Anwar Masadi
Publication date
2026/2/10
Journal
Journal of Pragmatics Research
Volume, 8 , Issue, 1
Pages: 409-434
Description
Reporting on Israeli attacks on Beirut reveals divergent media framings of the Israel–Hezbollah conflict, demonstrating that media actively shape public perceptions rather than merely transmitting information. This study compares the framing of Israeli attacks on Beirut in AP News, Reuters, and The Guardian using Robert Entman’s framing analysis, focusing on problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. Employing a descriptive qualitative method, thematically similar news articles published within comparable timeframes are analyzed to identify framing differences across outlets. The findings show that AP News adopts a security-oriented framing that presents Hezbollah as the main threat and legitimizes Israeli military actions, while Reuters offers a more balanced perspective by situating the attacks within concerns over escalation and regional stability. Conversely …
Scholar articles
Framing the Coverage of the Lebanon Conflict: An Entman Framing Analysis of AP News, Reuters, and The Guardian’s Reporting on Israeli Attacks on Beirut
N Mardiah, A Masadi - Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2026
Related articles

PegiatJurnal.com: Daftar Lengkap 41 Jurnal terindeks Scopus PTKIN & ...

PegiatJurnal.com: Daftar Lengkap 41 Jurnal terindeks Scopus PTKIN & ...:   Daftar Lengkap 41 Jurnal terindeks Scopus PTKIN & SJR-nya 1. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan Q1 SJR 1,517 2.  E...